Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41191851›Full record

ReviewJMIR biomedical engineering2025

Advancing Brain-Computer Interface Closed-Loop Systems for Neurorehabilitation: Systematic Review of AI and Machine Learning Innovations in Biomedical Engineering.

Christopher Williams, Fahim Islam Anik, Md Mehedi Hasan, Juan Rodriguez-Cardenas, Anushka Chowdhury, Shirley Tian, Selena He, Nazmus Sakib

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JMIR biomedical engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. [Emerging role of brain-computer interface in orthopedic rehabilitation and motor function restoration].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Christopher WilliamsDepartment of Computer Science, Troy University, Troy, AL, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-5398-5582
Fahim Islam AnikDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Khulna University of Engineering and Technology, Khulna, Bangladesh.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6121-266X
Md Mehedi HasanCollege of Computing and Software Engineering, Kennesaw State University, Marietta, 1100 South Marietta Pkwy SE, Marietta, GA, 30067, United States, 1 470-578-3803.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-4373-7684
Juan Rodriguez-CardenasCollege of Computing and Software Engineering, Kennesaw State University, Marietta, 1100 South Marietta Pkwy SE, Marietta, GA, 30067, United States, 1 470-578-3803.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-0448-9084
Anushka ChowdhuryLambert High School, Suwanee, GA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-7710-1034
Shirley TianCollege of Computing and Software Engineering, Kennesaw State University, Marietta, 1100 South Marietta Pkwy SE, Marietta, GA, 30067, United States, 1 470-578-3803.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0377-0639
Selena HeCollege of Computing and Software Engineering, Kennesaw State University, Marietta, 1100 South Marietta Pkwy SE, Marietta, GA, 30067, United States, 1 470-578-3803.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2332-9816
Nazmus SakibCollege of Computing and Software Engineering, Kennesaw State University, Marietta, 1100 South Marietta Pkwy SE, Marietta, GA, 30067, United States, 1 470-578-3803.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7008-1120

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Brain-computer interface (BCI) closed-loop systems have emerged as a promising tool in health care and wellness monitoring, particularly in neurorehabilitation and cognitive assessment. With the increasing burden of neurological disorders, including Alzheimer disease and related dementias (AD/ADRD), there is a critical need for real-time, noninvasive monitoring technologies. BCIs enable direct communication between the brain and external devices, leveraging artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) to interpret neural signals. However, challenges such as signal noise, data processing limitations, and privacy concerns hinder widespread implementation. Objective: The primary objective of this study is to investigate the role of ML and AI in enhancing BCI closed-loop systems for health care applications. Specifically, we aim to analyze the methods and parameters used in these systems, assess the effectiveness of different AI and ML techniques, identify key challenges in their development and implementation, and propose a framework for using BCIs in the longitudinal monitoring of AD/ADRD patients. By addressing these aspects, this study seeks to provide a comprehensive overview of the potential and limitations of AI-driven BCIs in neurological health care. Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, focusing on studies published between 2019 and 2024. We sourced research articles from PubMed, IEEE, ACM, and Scopus using predefined keywords related to BCIs, AI, and AD/ADRD. A total of 220 papers were initially identified, with 18 meeting the final inclusion criteria. Data extraction followed a structured matrix approach, categorizing studies based on methods, ML algorithms, limitations, and proposed solutions. A comparative analysis was performed to synthesize key findings and trends in AI-enhanced BCI systems for neurorehabilitation and cognitive monitoring. Results: The review identified several ML techniques, including transfer learning (TL), support vector machines (SVMs), and convolutional neural networks (CNNs), that enhance BCI closed-loop performance. These methods improve signal classification, feature extraction, and real-time adaptability, enabling accurate monitoring of cognitive states. However, challenges such as long calibration sessions, computational costs, data security risks, and variability in neural signals were also highlighted. To address these issues, emerging solutions such as improved sensor technology, efficient calibration protocols, and advanced AI-driven decoding models are being explored. In addition, BCIs show potential for real-time alert systems that support caregivers in managing AD/ADRD patients. Conclusions: BCI closed-loop systems, when integrated with AI and ML, offer significant advancements in neurological health care, particularly in AD/ADRD monitoring and neurorehabilitation. Despite their potential, challenges related to data accuracy, security, and scalability must be addressed for widespread clinical adoption. Future research should focus on refining AI models, improving real-time data processing, and enhancing user accessibility. With continued advancements, AI-powered BCIs can revolutionize personalized health care by providing continuous, adaptive monitoring and intervention for patients with neurological disorders.

Indexed as

AIArtificial Intelligencebiomedical signal processingBrain-Computer Interfaceclosed-loop systemscognitive monitoringhealthcare technologyhuman-computer interactionMachine LearningneurorehabilitationPRISMAreal-time monitoring

Identifiers

PMID41191851
PMCPMC12588595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.