ReviewRambam Maimonides medical journal2025
A Narrative Review of Multimodal Data Fusion Strategies for Precision Risk Prediction in Coronary Artery Disease: Advances, Challenges, and Future Informatics Directions.
Review in Rambam Maimonides medical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cardiovascular Disease Risk Assessment from Retinal Fundus Images Using a CSP-ConvNext Model.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence Techniques in Cardiac Neuromodulation: Mechanisms, Applications, and Pathways to Clinical Translation.Journal of arrhythmia · 2026Review
- Review
- Imaging-anchored multiomics in cardiovascular disease: integrating cardiac imaging, bulk, single-cell, and spatial transcriptomics.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in chronic kidney disease: Early detection, risk prediction, and personalized treatment strategies.World journal of nephrology · 2026Review
- Development of a MACE risk prediction model based on CCTA-derived quantitative parameters: a proof-of-concept study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traditional coronary artery disease (CAD) risk scores offer limited precision, often failing to capture the complex, multifactorial nature of the disease. The proliferation of multimodal data from imaging, genomics, electronic health records (EHRs), and wearables offers a transformative opportunity for more individualized risk prediction. This narrative review systematically maps and critically evaluates the landscape of multimodal data fusion for CAD risk prediction. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we synthesized 39 empirical studies published from 2009 to 2025 to identify key methodological patterns, informatics challenges, and future directions. Our synthesis reveals consistent methodological patterns: (1) integrating imaging biomarkers (e.g. coronary computed tomography angiography, coronary artery calcium scoring) with clinical data robustly enhances risk discrimination and reclassification; (2) adding polygenic risk scores provides incremental value, typically via late-fusion models; and (3) leveraging longitudinal EHR data with machine learning captures dynamic risk trajectories, outperforming static scores. Advanced machine learning architectures, particularly deep and graph neural networks, are pivotal for enabling automated feature extraction and modeling complex cross-modal interactions. Despite these advances, significant informatics hurdles persist, including data heterogeneity, algorithmic bias, the need for robust external validation, and challenges in clinical workflow integration. Multimodal data fusion is a cornerstone of precision cardiology, but realizing its clinical potential requires a concerted focus on developing fair, interpretable, and scalable methodological frameworks to translate complex data into improved patient outcomes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.