Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41191755›Full record

ArticleScience advances2025

Intersectional inequalities in social ties.

Samuel Martin-Gutierrez, Mauritz N Cartier van Dissel, Fariba Karimi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Samuel Martin-GutierrezNetwork Inequality and Algorithmic Fairness Group, Complexity Science Hub, Metternichgasse 8, 1030 Wien, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-5685-7834
Mauritz N Cartier van DisselNetwork Inequality and Algorithmic Fairness Group, Complexity Science Hub, Metternichgasse 8, 1030 Wien, Austria.ORCID 0009-0004-7916-6528
Fariba KarimiNetwork Inequality and Algorithmic Fairness Group, Complexity Science Hub, Metternichgasse 8, 1030 Wien, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-0037-2475

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social networks are shaped by complex, intersecting identities that drive our connection preferences. These preferences create tie inequalities: Systematic differences in the number of links members of different groups accumulate. Understanding tie inequalities is critical because they contribute to disparities in social capital, with downstream consequences for access to opportunities and resources. Previous research has examined the impact of single-dimensional identities on tie disparities, but when multiple identities intersect, network disadvantages accumulate nonlinearly, disproportionately harming individuals belonging to several disadvantaged groups. However, how multidimensional connection preferences affect network dynamics and amplify or mitigate differences in ties remains unknown. Using a network model, we characterize the effects of multidimensional preferences and attribute correlation. We find that correlation creates counterintuitive tie inequalities unobservable in one-dimensional systems. We calibrate the model with high school friendship data and derive closed-form expressions for tie inequalities, which reproduce the empirical patterns with remarkable accuracy. Our findings have substantial implications for addressing intersectional inequalities in social networks.

Indexed as

Social NetworkingSocioeconomic FactorsFemaleFriendsHumansMaleModels, TheoreticalSocial Capital

Identifiers

PMID41191755
PMCPMC13141896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.