ArticleThe Gerontologist2025
Predicting psychological resilience in older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic: a machine learning approach.
Article in The Gerontologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning in mental health promotion for older adults: a scoping review.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Social and community determinants of living arrangements among older adults: the role of social support and mental health promotion.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesThis study predicted psychological resilience among older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic based on a comprehensive, theory-informed set of factors at the individual, interpersonal, and community levels. RESEARCH DESIGN AND
methodsThe study sample consisted of 3,364 individuals who completed the 2016 and 2020 Leave-Behind Questionnaire from the Health and Retirement Study. A longitudinal design was used, with pre-pandemic predictors measured in 2016 and resilience measured in 2020. Three machine learning algorithms (LASSO, Ridge, and Random Forest) were trained with five-fold cross-validation. SHAP values were used to interpret feature importance.
resultsLASSO had the best model fit (RMSE = 0.873; R2 = 0.195). Twenty-four features emerged as important predictors. Psychological dispositions and resources, including four Big Five personality traits, optimism, purpose in life, life satisfaction, and religiosity, were strong predictors of resilience. Pre-pandemic social participation, social support, and neighborhood cohesion were also positively associated with resilience. Several indicators of technology adaptation, particularly learning a new device, and socio-behavioral adaptation during the pandemic were additional positive predictors of resilience. In contrast, older subjective age was linked to lower resilience. Several non-linear and interaction effects were identified. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Study findings underscore the complex, multifactorial nature of resilience and demonstrate the value of theory-informed data science approach in advancing our understanding of resilience. Addressing digital inequities and fostering supportive social relationships and community participation are potential targets for population-based strategies as we face increasing threats from disasters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.