Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41191690›Full record

ReviewRevista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical2025

Identifying disease vector images in the Americas in the age of artificial intelligence.

Vinícius Lima de Miranda, José Fabrício de Carvalho Leal, Isadora Ribeiro de Carvalho Gomes, Taís Oliveira de Araújo, Rodrigo Gurgel-Gonçalves

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. New technologies for identification and surveillance of Chagas disease vectors.Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Vinícius Lima de MirandaUniversidade de Brasília, Faculdade de Medicina, Laboratório de Parasitologia Médica e Biologia de Vetores, Brasília, DF, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1788-0959
José Fabrício de Carvalho LealUniversidade de Brasília, Faculdade de Medicina, Laboratório de Parasitologia Médica e Biologia de Vetores, Brasília, DF, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1402-2545
Isadora Ribeiro de Carvalho GomesUniversidade de Brasília, Faculdade de Medicina, Laboratório de Parasitologia Médica e Biologia de Vetores, Brasília, DF, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-0908-8911
Taís Oliveira de AraújoUniversidade de Brasília, Faculdade de Medicina, Laboratório de Parasitologia Médica e Biologia de Vetores, Brasília, DF, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6543-1037
Rodrigo Gurgel-GonçalvesUniversidade de Brasília, Faculdade de Medicina, Laboratório de Parasitologia Médica e Biologia de Vetores, Brasília, DF, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8252-8690

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital technologies and artificial intelligence (AI) have become integral in many fields, including medicine. Neglected tropical diseases transmitted by vectors, such as arboviral diseases, spotted fever, Chagas disease, and leishmaniasis, pose a significant impact on public health, particularly in the Americas. Strengthening surveillance and control requires the use of digital technology to identify vectors. In this study, we explored how AI can aid in identifying vectors in the Americas and strengthen disease surveillance and control efforts. We reviewed the literature on the automated identification of triatomines, mosquitoes, sand flies, and ticks, focusing on advances in the Americas over the last 10 years, and provided a critical analysis of the automated identification systems for each group. Moreover, we analyzed the development stages of each study: image acquisition, image processing, algorithm training, algorithm testing, app development, app availability, and AI-based devices for vector identification and surveillance. Most studies have applied AI to identify mosquito species. The vector species databases were not diverse, and the most representative group was Triatominae, comprising 65 species (41% of all described species). Currently, approximately 30 algorithms are used for automated vector identification, with the most common being AlexNet, MobileNet, and ResNet. Most studies are in the algorithm training stage, and in the Americas, only one study has progressed to the development of applications or devices. These results highlight the potential of AI for identifying vectors in the Americas, supporting the use of automated visual identification systems as a promising approach to improve vector surveillance, while also promoting citizen science.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceImage Processing, Computer-AssistedInsect VectorsAlgorithmsAmericasAnimalsHumans

Identifiers

PMID41191690
PMCPMC12585153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.