ReviewRevista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical2025
Identifying disease vector images in the Americas in the age of artificial intelligence.
Review in Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating AI-based mosquito monitoring technologies: a field study in Zhejiang Province, 2025.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- New technologies for identification and surveillance of Chagas disease vectors.Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Digital technologies and artificial intelligence (AI) have become integral in many fields, including medicine. Neglected tropical diseases transmitted by vectors, such as arboviral diseases, spotted fever, Chagas disease, and leishmaniasis, pose a significant impact on public health, particularly in the Americas. Strengthening surveillance and control requires the use of digital technology to identify vectors. In this study, we explored how AI can aid in identifying vectors in the Americas and strengthen disease surveillance and control efforts. We reviewed the literature on the automated identification of triatomines, mosquitoes, sand flies, and ticks, focusing on advances in the Americas over the last 10 years, and provided a critical analysis of the automated identification systems for each group. Moreover, we analyzed the development stages of each study: image acquisition, image processing, algorithm training, algorithm testing, app development, app availability, and AI-based devices for vector identification and surveillance. Most studies have applied AI to identify mosquito species. The vector species databases were not diverse, and the most representative group was Triatominae, comprising 65 species (41% of all described species). Currently, approximately 30 algorithms are used for automated vector identification, with the most common being AlexNet, MobileNet, and ResNet. Most studies are in the algorithm training stage, and in the Americas, only one study has progressed to the development of applications or devices. These results highlight the potential of AI for identifying vectors in the Americas, supporting the use of automated visual identification systems as a promising approach to improve vector surveillance, while also promoting citizen science.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.