Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41191654›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Practice beyond performance stabilization increases the use of online adjustments to unpredictable perturbations in an interceptive task.

Crislaine Rangel Couto, Cláudio Manoel Ferreira Leite, Carlos Eduardo Campos, Leonardo Luiz Portes, Cíntia de Oliveira Matos, Suziane Peixoto Santos, Natália Fontes Alves Ambrósio, Hani Camille Yehia, Herbert Ugrinowitsch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Crislaine Rangel CoutoSports Department, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais-UFMG, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3305-3208
Cláudio Manoel Ferreira LeiteDepartment of Physical Education and Health Science, Universidade Federal de São João del-Rei-UFSJ, São João del-Rei, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3875-5524
Carlos Eduardo CamposSports Department, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais-UFMG, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9794-8487
Leonardo Luiz PortesDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Western, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Cíntia de Oliveira MatosSports Department, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais-UFMG, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Suziane Peixoto SantosDepartment of Sports Science, Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro-UFTM, Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Natália Fontes Alves AmbrósioDepartment of Prevention and Health Promotion, Centro Universitário Una, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Hani Camille YehiaDepartment of Electronic Engineering, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais-UFMG, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4578-0525
Herbert UgrinowitschSports Department, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais-UFMG, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0317-1940

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent decades, research has focused on motor adjustments in interception tasks within predictable environments. However, emerging studies suggest that continued practice beyond performance stabilization enhances the ability to adapt to unpredictable events. The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of practicing until performance stabilization versus extended practice through superstabilization on the ability to adjust to unpredictable perturbations in intercepting a moving target. We hypothesized superstabilization would better facilitate motor adjustments in response to unpredictable perturbations. Forty participants engaged in an interception task until they achieved either performance stabilization or superstabilization. Subsequently, both stabilization and superstabilization groups were tested in an unpredictable environment, where, in certain trials, the target's velocity unexpectedly changed after the onset of the movement. The findings revealed that the superstabilization group made more adjustments, showing more number of corrections (N-cor), in response to these perturbations than the stabilization group, attributed to their developed capacity to use online feedback as a control mechanism more efficiently. In contrast, the practice until performance stabilization did not foster this adaptive mechanism. These results support the notion that learning is a dynamic process that extends beyond the point of performance stabilization, emphasizing the benefits of continued practice for mastering motor tasks in variable contexts.

Indexed as

Practice, PsychologicalPsychomotor PerformanceAdultFemaleHumansLearningMaleTask Performance and AnalysisYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41191654
PMCPMC12588517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.