Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41191640›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Adaptive multi-channel dehazing for enhanced visibility in underground coal mine images.

Yingbo Fan, Shanjun Mao, Mei Li, Boxiang Yang, Yinglu Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yingbo FanInstitute of Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Shanjun MaoInstitute of Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems, Peking University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1999-0946
Mei LiInstitute of Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Boxiang YangInstitute of Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Yinglu YangChina University of Mining & Technology, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Image dehazing has gained significant attention due to its importance in enhancing image clarity in various applications. However, existing algorithms often struggle with suboptimal performance in underground coal mine environments, characterized by dim lighting and atmospheric interference. This paper presents an adaptive multi-channel dehazing algorithm tailored for enhancing images from underground coal mines. By utilizing an improved color attenuation prior method, the algorithm effectively detects fog density, incorporating texture information and illumination invariance features from the HSV space for enhanced adaptability and robustness. The algorithm segregates foggy and fog-free image regions, applying image enhancement in clear areas and threshold multi-channel inspection dehazing in foggy regions. A multi-scale pyramid and guided filtering approach are employed to refine the estimation of image transmittance, mitigating blocky artifacts. For video dehazing, a parameter reuse mechanism leveraging inter-frame similarity significantly improves real-time performance. Experimental results on coal mine datasets and public benchmarks demonstrate that the proposed algorithm outperforms existing methods in defogging effectiveness, computational efficiency, and stability, rendering it suitable for real-time applications such as safety monitoring in underground coal mines.

Indexed as

Coal MiningImage EnhancementImage Processing, Computer-AssistedAlgorithmsHumans

Identifiers

PMID41191640
PMCPMC12588472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.