ArticlePloS one2025
Impact of agricultural subsidy on chemical fertilizer use: Empirical evidence of China's Organic-Substitute-Chemical-Fertilizer policy based on double machine learning.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The sustainable development of agriculture hinges on effective fertilizer management, and China's experience with chemical fertilizer overuse highlights the challenges and opportunities in this domain. This study examines the impact of agricultural subsidy policy on chemical fertilizer use across 2319 counties from 2012 to 2022. By treating the "Action Plan for Organic-Substitute-Chemical-Fertilizer (OSCF) for Fruits, Vegetables and Tea" as a quasi-natural experiment, this study uses a Double Machine Learning model to analyze its effects on fertilizer use and the underlying mechanisms, considering technical and scale efficiency as mediating variables. The findings reveal that the OSCF policy has a significant negative effect on chemical fertilizer use, primarily by enhancing both technical and scale efficiency. This study further reveals regional heterogeneity in the policy's effectiveness. The results imply that while the impact of the OSCF policy is generally beneficial, it is shaped by regional economic development, agricultural production structure and initial level of fertilizer use. This highlights the importance of tailored policy instruments to address regional disparities in agricultural practices and targeted strategies to maximize the OSCF policy's impact on sustainable agricultural development. This study provides valuable insights for policymakers and farm managers to enhance the sustainability of agricultural practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.