Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41191635›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Root cause analysis of accidents and examining their interrelations from the perspective of workers, supervisors, and safety officers.

Neda Molamehdizadeh, Gholam Hossein Halvani, Hossein Ebrahimi, Ali Asghar Farshad, Seyedeh Melika Kharghani Moghadam, Tahereh Eskandari

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Neda MolamehdizadehDepartment of Occupational Health and Safety Engineering, School of Public Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Gholam Hossein HalvaniDepartment of Occupational Health and safety Engineering, School of Public Health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yaz, Iran.
Hossein EbrahimiOccupational Health Research Center, Department of Occupational Health and Safety Engineering, School of Public Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5036-9736
Ali Asghar FarshadOccupational Health Research Center, Department of Occupational Health and Safety Engineering, School of Public Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Seyedeh Melika Kharghani MoghadamDepartment of Health Services, School of Public Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Tahereh EskandariOccupational Health Research Center, Department of Occupational Health and Safety Engineering, School of Public Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying the root causes of accidents and analyzing their causal relationships is a fundamental step in designing effective preventive strategies. This study aimed to uncover the root causes of mining accidents and determine the interactions among them from the perspectives of workers, supervisors, and safety officers using a mixed qualitative-quantitative approach and the fuzzy DEMATEL method. The study was designed as a mixed-method approach (qualitative-quantitative). In the qualitative phase, a total of 69 interviews were conducted (23 with workers, 21 with supervisors, and 25 with safety officers) to identify and categorize the root causes of accidents. In the quantitative phase, 33 participants (11 from each group) took part in expert panels where the fuzzy DEMATEL method was employed to analyze the relationships among the factors. The qualitative phase results revealed that workers primarily pointed to operational deficiencies, equipment issues, and workplace conditions. Supervisors emphasized human behavior, psychological stress, and a lack of safety culture, while safety officers highlighted managerial weaknesses and inefficient communication structures. The quantitative phase results identified management as the primary and most influential factor, whereas other factors, including humans, machinery, environment, and materials, predominantly appeared as dependent factors. This study's findings suggest that understanding and analyzing the causal relationships among factors, coupled with integrating diverse perspectives, can aid in designing effective preventive strategies and reducing mining accidents. This approach enhances safety, productivity, and job satisfaction.

Indexed as

Accidents, OccupationalMiningRoot Cause AnalysisAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSafety ManagementWorkplace

Identifiers

PMID41191635
PMCPMC12588458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.