Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41191633›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Adapting the WHO Behavioural and Social Drivers of Vaccination (BeSD) tools and Vaccination Attitudes Examination (VAX) scale for pregnant women in South Africa: Insights from a mixed-methods pilot study.

Imen Ayouni, Jennifer Nyawira Githaiga, Edina Amponsah-Dacosta, Benjamin M Kagina, Rudzani Muloiwa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Imen AyouniDepartment of Paediatrics and Child Health, Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9562-6238
Jennifer Nyawira GithaigaDivision of Social and Behavioural Sciences, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Edina Amponsah-DacostaVaccines for Africa Initiative and NITAG Support Hub, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3913-0457
Benjamin M KaginaVaccines for Africa Initiative and NITAG Support Hub, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Rudzani MuloiwaDepartment of Paediatrics and Child Health, Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnderstanding vaccine attitudes, knowledge, and perceptions is critical for improving vaccine uptake, particularly among vulnerable populations such as pregnant women. This study aimed to test and adapt quantitative survey tools and an interview guide for assessing maternal and childhood vaccine attitudes among pregnant women in the South African context.

methodsWe conducted a mixed-methods pilot study among pregnant women attending antenatal care at two public hospitals in Cape Town, South Africa, between September 2023 and January 2024. Quantitative data were collected using a self-administered questionnaire on tablets, incorporating the adapted BeSD and VAX tools, while qualitative data were gathered through semi-structured interviews. Additionally, the quantitative questionnaire contained the General Vaccine Attitude Survey questions developed by the World Health Organization Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization (WHO SAGE) Working Group on Vaccine Hesitancy and a validated tool on knowledge of influenza and attitudes toward influenza vaccination during pregnancy. Adaptations to the tools were informed by participant feedback and pretesting.

resultsEighty pregnant women agreed to participate in the quantitative survey, one participant dropped out of the study and seven completed follow-up qualitative interviews. The tools were well received, with participants reporting ease of use and understanding. Minor linguistic adjustments improved clarity, and participants identified healthcare providers as key influencers in vaccine decision-making. Knowledge gaps regarding maternal vaccination and concerns about vaccine safety during pregnancy were prominent. The mixed-methods approach provided complementary insights into the tools' applicability and participants' attitudes.

conclusionsThis pilot study demonstrated that the WHO BeSD tools, the VAX Scale, the General Vaccine Attitude Survey, and the questions on knowledge of influenza and attitudes toward influenza vaccination during pregnancy, with minor adaptations, are feasible and acceptable for use in South Africa. These findings support their application in larger studies to explore maternal vaccine confidence and decision-making. Addressing knowledge gaps and leveraging trusted sources of information is critical to enhancing vaccine uptake in similar settings.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeInfluenza, HumanPregnant PeopleVaccinationAdultFemaleHumansInfluenza VaccinesPilot ProjectsPregnancyPrenatal CareSouth AfricaSurveys and QuestionnairesVaccination HesitancyWorld Health OrganizationYoung AdultInfluenza Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID41191633
PMCPMC12588488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.