Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41191629›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Improving the safety of outpatient to Emergency Department transfers: A quality improvement study in a tertiary hospital in Pakistan.

Aziza Lakhani, Samar Fatima, Areej Khawaja, Qurratulain Virani, Muzna Hashmi, Tehreem Khan, Khairunnissa Hooda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Aziza LakhaniDepartment of Outpatient Services, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.
Samar FatimaDepartment of Medicine, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4617-129X
Areej KhawajaDepartment of Medicine, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0245-6314
Qurratulain ViraniDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.
Muzna HashmiDepartment of Medicine, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-0090-4880
Tehreem KhanDepartment of Medicine, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.
Khairunnissa HoodaDepartment of Outpatient Services, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSafe and coordinated patient transfers are essential for reducing morbidity, mortality, and adverse events. In outpatient clinics, early recognition of patient deterioration and standardized transfer protocols are key to enhancing safety. This quality improvement initiative addresses these gaps by ensuring the timely identification of critically ill patients, prompt management, and efficient transfer to the emergency department.

methodsThis study was conducted in two phases. In the pre-implementation phase (August 1-September 14, 2022), a multidisciplinary panel employed a modified Delphi method to revise early warning signs for critically ill clinic patients and developed a structured handoff tool to improve transfer communication. The tool was pilot tested and refined. The implementation phase (September 15-November 30, 2022) included hospital-wide training through webinars and in-person sessions, with effectiveness evaluated in forty staff members using pre- and post-training assessments. The quality initiative, comprising revised early warning criteria and standardized handoff documentation, was formally rolled out on December 1, 2022. Prospective data collection continued for one year (December 2022-November 2023) to evaluate the impact.

resultsPost-test scores demonstrated significant improvement in staff knowledge, particularly in identifying critically ill patients and initiating appropriate interventions. Among 268 patients requiring transfer, the majority (51.49%) were aged ≥60 years, and 56.3% were male. The most common presenting complaint was acute respiratory distress (31.7%). Compliance with the handoff tool was high (≥70% in 65.6% of cases). However, prolonged emergency department (ED) stays (>7 hours in 45.5% of cases) and a 5.2% mortality rate underscored ongoing challenges in patient flow and triaging.

conclusionImplementing structured transfer protocols, staff training, and standardized handoff tools can significantly improve patient transfer safety and efficiency in outpatient settings. However, further refinements, including enhanced triaging and digitizing documentation practices, are necessary for sustainable improvement. This project highlights the importance of systematic approaches in optimizing intra-hospital transfers in low-resource settings.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalPatient SafetyPatient TransferQuality ImprovementTertiary Care CentersAdultAgedCritical IllnessFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOutpatientsPakistanProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID41191629
PMCPMC12588536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.