ArticlePloS one2025
Evidence for an indigenous female mouse urobiome.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Methodological bias shapes the interpretation of the urinary microbiome in low-biomass systems.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mice have been used as a valuable model for understanding pathophysiological mechanisms of urinary tract infection for almost six decades. Mice offer many advantages including genetic manipulation to test the role of genes and mechanisms, the availability of germ-free mice, and similarities to humans in innate immune defenses and the strain-dependent presence of vesicoureteral reflux. However, like with humans, the mouse bladder urine above the urinary sphincter has generally been assumed to be sterile. Yet, given the presence of urobiomes in other mammals and the emerging role of the human urobiome in the defense of the urinary bladder and upper urinary tract, the existence of a mouse urobiome should be critically examined as indigenous microbiota may influence experimental results. To determine if an indigenous murine urobiome exists, we obtained voided urine from two sets of female C57BL/6J mice during three different intervals using two different extraction and sequencing methods and analyzed them simultaneously by a single method. For one set, we also obtained urine by suprapubic aspiration, which we compared to the paired voided urine samples. We conclude that an indigenous murine urobiome exists and that voided urine contains post-urethral microbes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.