Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41191617›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Picoplankton nitrogen guilds in the tropical and subtropical oceans: From the surface to the deep.

Juan Rivas-Santisteban, Nuria Fernández-González, Rafael Laso-Pérez, Javier Tamames, Carlos Pedrós-Alió

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Juan Rivas-SantistebanSystems Biology Department, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología (CNB-CSIC), Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7482-9941
Nuria Fernández-GonzálezSystems Biology Department, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología (CNB-CSIC), Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7468-9643
Rafael Laso-PérezSystems Biology Department, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología (CNB-CSIC), Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6912-7865
Javier TamamesSystems Biology Department, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología (CNB-CSIC), Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4547-8932
Carlos Pedrós-AlióSystems Biology Department, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología (CNB-CSIC), Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1009-4277

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ecological guilds quantify the incidence and extent of resource transformation functions, irrespective of the species involved. Therefore, tackling the microbial nitrogen guilds is key to our understanding of the oceanic nitrogen cycle, but quantitative estimates of guild contribution across varying depths and under specific environmental conditions have yet to be accomplished. In this study, we examine the main picoplankton guilds participating in nitrogen cycling within the low and mid-latitude ocean ecosystems, from the surface down to 4000 m, using data obtained from 75 samples belonging to 11 stations in the Malaspina dataset. In particular, we used a quantitative approach to investigate the stability of nitrogen acquisition and nitrogen-redox guilds separately. Our results showed that nitrogen acquisition guilds are more stable and redundant than nitrogen-redox guilds across depths and site specific conditions. For example, differential conditions such as nitrogen depletion and oxygen availability affected the two groups of guilds in different ways. These findings have implications for the understanding of global nitrogen fluxes and the biosphere's functional diversification.

Indexed as

NitrogenNitrogen CyclePhytoplanktonPlanktonEcosystemOceans and SeasSeawaterTropical ClimateNitrogen

Identifiers

PMID41191617
PMCPMC12588538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.