ArticlePloS one2025
Evaluation of the soil microbiome of three raised beaches in the Devon Island Lowland, High Arctic, Canada.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Arctic region is characterized by severe temperatures and a unique ecosystem with largely unexplored microbiomes. Whereas soil microbiomes in temperate regions play key roles in nutrient cycling, organic matter decomposition, greenhouse gas fluxes, and overall ecosystem functioning, Arctic microbiomes remain poorly understood, highlighting the need for a thorough characterization to better predict and manage soil health and resilience. In this study, we compared the microbial profiles of three raised beaches on Devon Island (Nunavut, Canadian Arctic Archipelago), which emerged sequentially between eight and two thousand years ago, to assess their similarities and differences. Samples were collected by genetic horizons along excavations from the top layer to the permafrost. For each horizon, total soil DNA, 16S gene copies dPCR quantification, 16S metabarcoding, and functional prediction were carried out. Total DNA quantification revealed a consistently comparable concentration of genetic material across the three soil beaches (AB2 μ = 2.28 ± 5.44 μg ∙ g-1, AB1 μ = 4.71 ± 2.35 μg ∙ g-1, AB3 μ = 5.44 ± 2.91 μg ∙ g-1), regardless of site age (AB2 = 2,360 YBP, AB1 = 6,726 YBP, AB3 = 8,410 YBP). Conversely, clear differences emerged by comparing the different horizons at each site. The hierarchical cluster analysis based on the Bray-Curtis dissimilarity matrix revealed a clear separation between surface and deep horizons. The core microbiome analysis highlighted Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, and Firmicutes as the three predominant phyla accounting for relative abundances of 42%, 22%, and 18%, respectively. Remarkable evidence was the unexpectedly high taxonomic diversity that was recorded in these sites and that surprisingly matched with the commonly observed values in soils of temperate regions. Since these stony shores developed under cold, life-limiting conditions, their apparent microbial richness raises doubts about the potential biases in inferring physiological contexts and active biodiversity directly inferred from culture-independent DNA-based studies. The reason is that such inventories can be possibly inflated, in all environments, by chronically accumulated cells from passive immigration events through atmospheric discharge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.