ArticlePLOS global public health2025
Exploring current and potential roles of informal healthcare providers in tuberculosis care in West Bengal, India: A qualitative content analysis.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Strengthening TB care pathways: Integrating informal and AYUSH practitioners for early diagnosis and referral.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Unlocking the potential of informal healthcare providers in tuberculosis care: insights from India.BMJ global health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
India accounts for 27 percent of global Tuberculosis (TB) cases, the highest among the 30 high-burden countries. Despite growing evidence highlighting the significance and potential of Informal Healthcare Providers (IPs) in TB care, their role remains ambiguous in India's TB policies and programs, in contrast to the well-defined roles of the formal private sector. Considering such gaps, this study explores the perspectives of IPs (specifically untrained allopathic practitioners, UAPs) and National TB Elimination Program (NTEP)-affiliated personnel regarding IPs' current and potential roles in TB care. The study was conducted in West Bengal, India. We adopted a qualitative approach and conducted in-depth interviews with 23 IPs and 11 NTEP-affiliated personnel. The study data was analysed using a content analysis approach. The study's findings identified four current roles of IPs in TB care, two of which were corroborated by NTEP-affiliated personnel: 1) Passive case finding and referral and 2) Treatment supporter. As for potential roles, an alignment was observed between the two groups of providers for the majority of the roles (5/7 roles). However, both IPs and NTEP-affiliated personnel expressed reservations about assigning IPs the roles of 1) Clinical evaluation of people with TB and 2) Initiation of treatment for confirmed people with TB. The findings highlight the active involvement of IPs in various TB care roles, acknowledged by NTEP-affiliated personnel, and also demonstrate significant potential for their expanded engagement under the NTEP of India.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.