Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41191594›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

A mixed methods study protocol evaluating early screening, triaging, risk assessment and health optimisation in perioperative pathways.

Katie Gilchrist, Bo Hou, James Bedford, Patrick Nyikavaranda, Margaret Ogden, Grainne Brady, Angus I G Ramsay, Ramani Moonesinghe, Snehal M Pinto Pereira, Cecilia Vindrola-Padros

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Katie GilchristResearch Department of Targeted Intervention, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Central London Patient Safety Research Collaboration (PSRC), University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Bo HouResearch Department of Targeted Intervention, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Central London Patient Safety Research Collaboration (PSRC), University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5337-6560
James BedfordUCLH Surgical Outcomes Research Centre, Department of Anaesthesia and Peri-operative Medicine, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6045-3226
Patrick NyikavarandaDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, Brighton & Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9896-6078
Margaret OgdenResearch Department of Targeted Intervention, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Central London Patient Safety Research Collaboration (PSRC), University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Grainne BradyResearch Department of Targeted Intervention, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Central London Patient Safety Research Collaboration (PSRC), University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Angus I G RamsayDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4446-6916
Ramani MoonesingheResearch Department of Targeted Intervention, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Central London Patient Safety Research Collaboration (PSRC), University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Snehal M Pinto PereiraResearch Department of Targeted Intervention, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Central London Patient Safety Research Collaboration (PSRC), University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0876-8757
Cecilia Vindrola-PadrosResearch Department of Targeted Intervention, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Central London Patient Safety Research Collaboration (PSRC), University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7859-1646

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOver 10 million operations are carried out every year in the UK, improving millions of lives. While most operations are low-risk, some result in patients having poor outcomes. Preoperative assessment evaluates a patient's health prior to surgery to identify risks and where possible minimise them through optimisation. However, this preoperative assessment often takes place close to the planned date of surgery, meaning there is little time to optimise patients' health. Early preoperative screening is the process of evaluating a patient's health earlier in the surgical pathway. In 2023, NHS England introduced a new programme where all hospitals were to implement early screening, triaging, risk assessment and health optimisation with the aim of increasing safety through reduced perioperative complications, increased efficiency (e.g., through reductions in last-minute cancellations), reductions in length of hospital stay, and identifying people who can undergo surgery without requiring an overnight stay. Here we describe the protocol to examine the implementation and impact of this new programme.

methodsA mixed methods research design will be used to evaluate this new programme. We will conduct a formative implementation evaluation using rapid qualitative methods consisting of interviews with staff members and patients across three broadly representative specialities (colorectal cancer surgery, repair of abdominal aorta and knee replacement) and observations of key meetings held regarding implementation activities. An interrupted time series analysis will address patient centered outcomes (days alive and out of hospital at 30, 180 and 365 days after surgery; postoperative hospital length of stay; emergency re-admission within 30 days) using routinely collected electronic health records. DISCUSSION: This study will provide lessons on the barriers and facilitators to implementation and will highlight staff and patient experiences of the new programme. It will also assess impact on patient centred outcomes using routinely collected hospital data and quasi-experimental research methods.

Indexed as

Perioperative CareTriageEnglandHumansLength of StayRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID41191594
PMCPMC12588520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.