ArticlePloS one2025
Demographic influences on trust in artificial intelligence across cognitive domains: A statistical perspective.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Describe or Direct? Artificial Intelligence Explanation Type, Trust and User Behaviour in a Medical Imaging Rostering Task.Journal of medical radiation sciences · 2026Article
- Determinants of Trust in Artificial Intelligence (AI) for Health-Related Decision-Making Among Adults in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As artificial intelligence (AI) systems become increasingly integrated into decision-making across various sectors, understanding public trust in these systems is more crucial than ever. This study presents a quantitative analysis of survey data from 335 participants to examine how demographic factors, age, gender, familiarity with AI, and frequency of technology use influence trust across a range of cognitive tasks. The findings reveal statistically significant relationships that vary by task type, with distinct patterns emerging in memory recall, complex problem-solving, and medical decision-making. Familiarity with AI and frequent use of technology are strong predictors of trust, suggesting that exposure and experience enhance confidence in AI capabilities. Conversely, age contributes significantly to disparities in responses, especially in high-stakes domains like healthcare, where older participants exhibit greater skepticism. Gender-based differences are also observed, though less pronounced. These results underscore the importance of AI systems that are technically sound and sensitive to user diversity, advocating for personalized and context-aware trust-building strategies to support the ethical and effective integration of AI into human decision-making processes. The SEM model explained 43% of the variance in trust toward AI. Based on the findings, we recommend designing adaptive, user-centered AI systems and enhancing public education to reduce skepticism and increase familiarity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.