Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41191563›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Best practice guidance for recreational and professional drones near colonial breeding birds.

Estefania Velilla, Nadia Hijner, Annelies van Ginkel, Maarten Zwarts, Jannes H T Heusinkveld, Kees Koffijberg, Kees Oosterbeek, Julia Stahl, Sjoerd Duijns, Laura L Govers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Estefania VelillaMarine Conservation Group, Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7678-2390
Nadia HijnerMarine Conservation Group, Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Annelies van GinkelMarine Conservation Group, Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Maarten ZwartsThe Fieldwork Company, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Jannes H T HeusinkveldThe Fieldwork Company, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Kees KoffijbergSovon, Dutch Centre for Field Ornithology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Kees OosterbeekSovon, Dutch Centre for Field Ornithology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Julia StahlSovon, Dutch Centre for Field Ornithology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Sjoerd DuijnsSovon, Dutch Centre for Field Ornithology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5158-6596
Laura L GoversMarine Conservation Group, Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drone use has increased sharply worldwide over the past decade, leading to more frequent interactions with wildlife. The rapid advancement of drones for ecological monitoring and research has further contributed to these encounters, which may disturb animal behavior, such as triggering flight responses in birds. Therefore, best-practice guidelines are urgently needed to help operators and site managers minimize disturbances. This study aimed to establish safe operating distances for seven common colonial breeding bird species: black-headed gull (Chroicocephalus ridibundus), herring gull (Larus argentatus), lesser black-backed gull (Larus fuscus), Sandwich tern (Thalasseus sandvicensis), common tern (Sterna hirundo), Eurasian spoonbill (Platalea leucorodia), and great cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo). We assessed the effects of professional and consumer-grade drones flying at altitudes between 5 and 50 meters on the flight responses of these species at breeding sites in the Dutch Wadden Sea. Of 1492 drone flights, 7.4% caused disturbances, defined as more than 10% of birds becoming airborne. Flight initiation distance (FID), the distance between a bird and the drone at the moment of flight response, varied by species. Sandwich terns and common terns had the largest FID (>170 m), followed by black-headed gulls (>160 m), herring gulls and lesser black-backed gulls (>60 m), while great cormorants and Eurasian spoonbills had the shortest (~5 m). When selecting drone flight locations, we recommend considering species-specific FID and using the maximum diagonal FID as a guideline. Disturbance decreases with altitude, so flights should be conducted at 50 meters or higher whenever possible. These findings provide concrete guidelines to inform policy and promote the responsible use of drones in wildlife research and management.

Indexed as

AircraftBirdsFlight, AnimalAnimalsBreedingCharadriiformesConservation of Natural ResourcesHumans

Identifiers

PMID41191563
PMCPMC12588502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.