ArticlePloS one2025
Predicting coastal erosion susceptibility in Bangladesh under climate scenario via machine learning techniques.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Using advanced machine learning methods along with geospatial data and climate estimates, this study found areas in Bangladesh that are likely to experience coastal erosion. Twenty important factors were looked at, such as meteorological, geographical, hydrological, tropological, and land-use variables. The normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) was found to be the most important factor. An ensemble machine learning technique was used to figure out how susceptible coastal areas are to erosion. Several types of boosting techniques were used, including Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), Categorical Boosting (CatBoost), Gradient Boosted Decision Trees (GBDT), and AdaBoost. Random Forest, Decision Tree, Treebag, Bagging, and Averaged Neural Network (avNNet) were also used. The area under the curve (AUC) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) values were used to check how well the model worked. XGBoost had the best AUC, at 0.95, which means it did a very good job of classifying places that are likely to be washed away by erosion. The study of geography showed that most of the models showed moderate-risk areas, which made up 71.82% to 79.36% of the whole area. Some of the districts that were identified as mostly high-risk were Bhola (19.41%), Cox's Bazar (26.20%), and Patuakhali (21.47%). A lot of low-risk zones were found in places like Jashore and Narail, on the other hand. Predictions of how likely erosion will be in the future based on different warming models to make Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs 2.6, 4.5, 6.0, and 8.5) for the years 2040, 2060, 2080, and 2100, we used data from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5). In line with RCP 8.5, the number of high-risk places is expected to rise to 50% by 2080 and to 40% by 2100. RCP 6.0 had a smooth shift, and in high-risk areas, there were only small rises. RCP 2.6, 4.5, and 6.0 all went up a little. These results show that Bangladesh's shore is becoming more likely to be worn away by erosion as temperatures rise. They stress how important it is to quickly react, handle coastal areas, and use planning methods that are resilient to climate change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.