ArticleBlood advances2026
Diagnostic criteria for NK cell large granular lymphocyte leukemia: validation through a multicentric international study.
Article in Blood advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Revisiting KIR restriction and CD94 expression in diagnostic criteria for NK-large granular lymphocytic leukemia.Blood advances · 2026Article
- Immunophenotyping challenges in the diagnosis of NK-LGLL.Blood advances · 2026Article
- Diagnosis of NK-large granular lymphocytic leukemia.Blood advances · 2026Article
- [Chinese expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of large granular lymphocytic leukemia (2026)].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
abstractNatural killer (NK) large granular lymphocytic leukemia (LGLL) is a rare lymphoproliferative disorder lacking definitive clonality markers, complicating diagnosis and distinction from reactive NK cell expansions. We previously proposed an NK clonality score with high diagnostic accuracy, but a subset of patients remained unclassified. In this multicenter international study, we refined and validated updated diagnostic criteria using independent training (n = 78) and validation (n = 57) cohorts from 3 national registries (United States, Italy, and France). The revised framework integrates NK score parameters with CC motif chemokine ligand 22 (CCL22) mutations and bone marrow biopsy (BMB) findings. Four major criteria were defined: NK cell count of ≥1.0 × 109/L, killer-cell immunoglobulin-like receptor restriction, CD94/NKG2A overexpression, and somatic mutations in STAT3, TET2, or CCL22, the latter newly introduced. In the training cohort, 50 patients were classified as having NK-LGLL by an NK score of >4, 18 had intermediate scores (2-3), and 10 were diagnosed as reactive proliferations. CCL22 mutations were identified in 16 patients (20%), including 5 with intermediate scores who were reclassified as NK-LGLL; BMB supported the diagnosis in 2 additional cases, resulting in 57 NK-LGLL overall. These patients exhibited more cytopenias, higher treatment needs, and greater transfusion requirements than patients with alternative diagnoses. In the validation cohort (25 NK-LGLL and 32 reactive cases), CCL22 mutations were detected in 5 NK-LGLL (20%). Altogether, incorporation of CCL22 mutations reduced the fraction of unclassified patients, improved diagnostic sensitivity without compromising specificity, and may decrease reliance on invasive procedures. These revised international criteria represent a step toward standardized, molecularly guided NK-LGLL diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.