ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2025
Protein Structural Model Selection Informed by Comparison of Predicted Ligand Binding Poses.
Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Predicting Ligand Binding Modes by Scaffold-Guided Structure Refinement.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent advances in protein structure prediction have highlighted the importance of a longstanding problem: given multiple structural models of a protein, how does one select the best model to use when predicting interactions between that protein and candidate drug molecules? Here we demonstrate the value of a previously unutilized source of information in addressing this problem. We show that given multiple ligands known to bind the protein, one can perform effective model selection by comparing the predicted binding poses of multiple ligands at each model. We introduce a method, RevBind, that exploits this information, leveraging the statistical tendency of different ligands to form similar chemical interactions with a protein's binding pocket. RevBind can be used, for example, to select among variants of AlphaFold models, identifying those that are most useful for molecular docking. Our findings pave the way for the development of even better model selection methods that draw simultaneously on the information used by RevBind and the information used by previous methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.