Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41191523›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2025

Protein Structural Model Selection Informed by Comparison of Predicted Ligand Binding Poses.

Masha Karelina, Ron O Dror

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Masha KarelinaBiophysics Program, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, United States.
Ron O DrorBiophysics Program, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6418-2793

Funding

Emergent Properties of Complex Systems: From Atoms to Macromolecules; from Humans to SocietiesR35GM122543 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MICHAEL LEVITT · 2017 to 2026
$5.1M
From protein structures to effective drugs via machine learning and molecular simulationR35GM158122 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Ron Dror · 2025 to 2026
$1.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM122543NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM158122
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in protein structure prediction have highlighted the importance of a longstanding problem: given multiple structural models of a protein, how does one select the best model to use when predicting interactions between that protein and candidate drug molecules? Here we demonstrate the value of a previously unutilized source of information in addressing this problem. We show that given multiple ligands known to bind the protein, one can perform effective model selection by comparing the predicted binding poses of multiple ligands at each model. We introduce a method, RevBind, that exploits this information, leveraging the statistical tendency of different ligands to form similar chemical interactions with a protein's binding pocket. RevBind can be used, for example, to select among variants of AlphaFold models, identifying those that are most useful for molecular docking. Our findings pave the way for the development of even better model selection methods that draw simultaneously on the information used by RevBind and the information used by previous methods.

Indexed as

Molecular Docking SimulationProteinsBinding SitesLigandsModels, MolecularProtein BindingProtein ConformationLigandsProteins

Identifiers

PMID41191523
PMCPMC13198408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.