ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025
Revisiting the high-dimensional geometry of population responses in the visual cortex.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Developmental tuning of functional manifold dimensionality across the human brain.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Disentangling signal and noise in neural responses through generative modeling.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Article
- High-dimensional neuronal activity from low-dimensional latent dynamics: a solvable model.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Structured flexibility in recurrent neural networks via neuromodulation.Advances in neural information processing systems · 2024Article
- Disentangling signal and noise in neural responses through generative modeling.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Structured flexibility in recurrent neural networks via neuromodulation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent advances in large-scale recording technology have spurred inquiries into the high-dimensional geometry of the neural code. However, characterizing this geometry from noisy neural responses, particularly in datasets with more neurons than trials, poses major statistical challenges. We address this problem by developing tools for the accurate estimation of high-dimensional signal geometry. We apply these tools to investigate the geometry of representations in the mouse primary visual cortex. Previous work has argued that these representations exhibit a power law, in which the [Formula: see text]th principal component falls off as [Formula: see text]. Here, we show that response geometry in V1 is better described by a broken power law, in which two different exponents govern the falloff of early and late eigenmodes of population activity. Our analysis reveals that later modes decay more rapidly than previously suggested, resulting in a substantially lower-dimensional representation that is concentrated in early modes. We thus characterize the stimulus encoding of these dominant population modes. We find properties of population coding in the mouse primary visual cortex that underscore its greater tractability relative to single-neuron characterization. Specifically, we find these modes encode visual features with far higher fidelity than single neurons, and these features are easier to characterize than the tuning of single neurons: both classical and deep network models of V1 achieve more than [Formula: see text] better predictive performance for eigenmodes than single neurons. Overall, our approach overturns prior results and reveals emergent structure in a population sensory representation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.