ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2025
The Role of Health Literacy in Perceived Information Provision, Satisfaction, and Health-related Quality of Life Among Rare and Common Cancer Patients: A Population-based Registry Study.
Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Health literacy (HL) has been found to affect perceived information provision (PIP), satisfaction with information provision, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with cancer. Patients with a rare cancer are confronted with challenges, such as a lack of information. The aim of this study was to explore the impact of HL on PIP, satisfaction with information provision, and on HRQoL in rare compared to common cancer patients.A population-based study was conducted using the PROFILES registry. Patients with rare (n = 385) and common (n = 1,692) cancer were included. Within group associations (low/medium HL, high HL, rare cancer, common cancer) were assessed. Regression analyses were used to assess associations between HL, PIP, satisfaction, and HRQoL, taking cancer group into account.Within the low/medium HL group, no statistically significant differences were found between rare and common cancer patients. Yet, within the high HL group, rare cancer patients scored significantly lower on all PIP-categories (except PIP-medical tests), satisfaction and HRQoL. Within the rare cancer group, patients with low/medium HL scored lower, compared to those with high HL, on PIP-medical tests and PIP-treatment, while within the common cancer group, patients with low/medium HL scored lower on all PIP-categories, satisfaction and HRQoL (all: p<0.05).Information needs might vary between patients with a different HL level and/or cancer group. Healthcare professionals should take individual needs into account, with a special focus on patients with a rare cancer and low/medium HL, in order to convey information in an understandable, patient-tailored way.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41191317What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.