ArticleCommunity mental health journal2026
Providers' Perceptions of Trauma-Focused EBT/EBP Implementation Fidelity: Implementation Process and Individual Influences.
Article in Community mental health journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Implementation fidelity is the extent to which an intervention is delivered in the manner in which it was designed. Within randomized-controlled trials (RCTs), fidelity is often rigorously ensured through strategies out of reach for most organizations. This limitation may be of particular concern for trauma-focused evidence-based treatments/evidence-based practices (EBT/EBPs), as the needs of individuals and families seeking trauma-based treatment are often complex, with existing comorbidities that can complicate recovery. The present study used the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to examine implementation process and individual characteristics, as well as interactions among these factors in impacting provider's perceptions of fidelity. Data came from 598 primarily child serving mental health providers, who completed an online survey regarding provider demographics, perceptions of personal effectiveness, work experiences such as secondary traumatic stress (STS) and compassion satisfaction, and organizational implementation strategies used for a trauma-focused EBT/EBP. Significant positive associations were found between perceptions of implementation fidelity and compassion satisfaction, implementation strategy use, and personal effectiveness. Further, STS was significantly negatively associated with implementation fidelity. Significant differences were found based on population served and use of consultation calls and in-person supervision. Within a regression model, a significant two-way interaction between STS and implementation strategy use was significant, along with a three-way interaction between STS, implementations strategy use, and personal effectiveness. This study advances our understanding of how fidelity is created, maintained and understood in implementation settings that provide EBT/EBPs to individuals exposed to trauma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41191258What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.