ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2026
Effect of Prophylactic Colon ESD (Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection) Defect Closure on Post-ESD Outcomes: An International Multi-center Retrospective Study.
Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Optimizing detection and resection of colorectal polyps.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
32 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsProphylactic colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) defect closure may reduce delayed adverse events (DAEs) such as bleeding and perforation associated with ESD and facilitate same day discharge. We compared the effect of colonic ESD defect closure (closed group) with no closure (open group) on DAEs and overnight hospital admission.
methodsWe performed a Western multicenter retrospective study on patients who underwent colon ESD. Rectal lesions were excluded. DAEs were defined as adverse events within 2 weeks of ESD. Primary outcome measures were DAEs and overnight hospital admission. Multivariate analyses were performed.
results560 patients underwent colon ESD and 364 (71.8%) patients had complete defect closure. Closed group had a significantly lower rate of delayed bleeding (1.7% vs 5.6%, p = 0.03) compared to open group. Multivariate analysis with adjusted odds ratios (aOR) revealed right sided polyps (aOR = 7.0) and anticoagulation/antiplatelet agents (aOR = 6.6) increased the risk while defect closure (aOR = 0.2) decreased the risk of delayed bleeding. Defect closure amplified the reduction in risk of delayed bleeding (2.4% vs 10.4%, p = 0.014) for right-sided polyps. Malignant polyps significantly increased the risk of delayed perforation (aOR = 3.3) and overnight hospitalization (aOR = 2.9). Defect closure (aOR = 0.6), traction use (aOR = 0.6) and topical hemostatic agent use (aOR = 0.4) significantly reduced the risk of overnight hospitalization.
conclusionProphylactic closure of colon ESD defects was associated with a significant reduction in delayed bleeding with number needed to treat (NNT) of 25.6 (especially for right sided polyps, NNT 12.5), and post-procedural overnight hospitalization. Prospective studies are needed to further validate these results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.