Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41191141›Full record

Trial reportNeurosurgical review2025

Does social media promotion influence citation counts? A long-term follow-up to a randomised trial in a general neurosurgical journal.

Albert Q Schmidt, Sven Theiler, Mateo Tomas Fariña Nuñez, Victor Gabriel El-Hajj, Moira Vieli, Bianca Battilana, Alex Alamri, Katrin Rabiei, Laura Lippa, Claire Karekezi and 5 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Albert Q SchmidtDepartment of Neurosurgery, Machine Intelligence in Clinical Neuroscience & Microsurgical Neuroanatomy (MICN) Laboratory, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, CH-8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Sven TheilerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Machine Intelligence in Clinical Neuroscience & Microsurgical Neuroanatomy (MICN) Laboratory, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, CH-8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Mateo Tomas Fariña NuñezDepartment of Neurosurgery, Machine Intelligence in Clinical Neuroscience & Microsurgical Neuroanatomy (MICN) Laboratory, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, CH-8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Victor Gabriel El-HajjDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Intitutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Moira VieliDepartment of Neurosurgery, Machine Intelligence in Clinical Neuroscience & Microsurgical Neuroanatomy (MICN) Laboratory, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, CH-8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Bianca BattilanaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Machine Intelligence in Clinical Neuroscience & Microsurgical Neuroanatomy (MICN) Laboratory, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, CH-8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Alex AlamriDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Katrin RabieiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Art Clinic, Uppsala, Sweden.
Laura LippaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Senese, Siena, Italy.
Claire KarekeziDepartment of Neurosurgery, Rwanda Military Hospital, Kigali, Rwanda.
Angelos KoliasDivision of Neurosurgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Carlo SerraDepartment of Neurosurgery, Machine Intelligence in Clinical Neuroscience & Microsurgical Neuroanatomy (MICN) Laboratory, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, CH-8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Luca RegliDepartment of Neurosurgery, Machine Intelligence in Clinical Neuroscience & Microsurgical Neuroanatomy (MICN) Laboratory, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, CH-8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Tiit MathiesenDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Intitutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Victor E StaartjesDepartment of Neurosurgery, Machine Intelligence in Clinical Neuroscience & Microsurgical Neuroanatomy (MICN) Laboratory, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, CH-8091, Zurich, Switzerland. victoregon.staartjes@usz.ch.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social media promotion has become mainstream for neurosurgical publications. Any effect of promotion on citation counts would significantly influence academia and is currently not well-studied. We previously reported that structured social media promotion of neurosurgical articles had no significant effect on citation counts, website visits, or PDF downloads at one- and two-years post promotion. In this study, we assess whether a longer follow-up period has altered these previously reported results, since citation counts typically follow a Poisson-like distribution, increasing gradually and often peaking several years after publication. We followed up the original 177 articles published in Acta Neurochirurgica between May and September 2020 which were randomised either to the social media intervention (single Twitter/X post, n = 89) or to the control group (no promotion, n = 88). The primary outcome (citation counts) and secondary outcomes (website visits and altmetrics) were reassessed 4.5 years post-promotion. Between-group comparisons were performed using Welch's t-tests. A sensitivity analysis was conducted using negative binomial regression models, better approximating the non-linear distribution of citation counts. At 4.5 years, there was no significant difference between intervention and control groups for citation counts (12.76 ± 12.18 vs. 16.47 ± 21.92, p = 0.168) and website visits (1448 ± 1489 vs. 1503 ± 1692, p = 0.818). Altmetric scores were significantly higher in the intervention group (5.15 ± 3.88 vs. 1.74 ± 3.68, p < 0.001). The sensitivity analysis confirmed these findings, showing no significant difference in citation counts (IRR 0.78; 95% CI: 0.57-1.05; p = 0.101) but a significant increase in Altmetric scores (IRR 2.96; 95% CI: 2.09-4.19; p < 0.001). A longer observation time did not result in a significant difference in citation counts or website visits. Promoted articles were consistently associated with increased Altmetric scores. A low-intensity social media promotion may broaden visibility but does not influence long-term citations. More intensive promotion strategies have demonstrated short-term gains, but their ability to produce sustained long-term impact remains uncertain and warrants further investigation.

Indexed as

BibliometricsNeurosurgeryPeriodicals as TopicSocial MediaFollow-Up StudiesHumansCitationsNeurosurgeryRandomized Controlled TrialSocial MediaTwitterX

Identifiers

PMID41191141
PMCPMC12589238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.