ArticleChromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology2025
From minor loci to major players? Satellite DNA diversification in Crepis sensu stricto.
Article in Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Satellite DNA evolution in two holocentric species of Edessa true bugs (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) with unusually high heterochromatin abundance.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2026Article
- Cytogenomics of Myloplus tiete reveals conserved satellite DNAs since the Late Eocene in Serrasalmidae (Teleostei, Characiformes).Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2026Article
- Comparison of Genomes of Species fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Crepis sensu lato (s.l.) comprises species with remarkable variation in genome size, chromosome number, and karyotype structure, making this genus a valuable model for studying genome and chromosome evolution. Studies in various plant systems have suggested that diversification and speciation may be accompanied by dynamic changes in the repetitive DNA fraction, including satellite DNAs (satDNAs). A complex approach consisting of molecular (cloning, dot-blot and Southern hybridisation), cytogenetic (fluorescent in situ hybridisation) and phylogenetic methods allowed assessing the chromosomal and genomic organisation of three satDNAs in 32 species from Crepis s.l.. In the present study, we posed a question of whether these satDNAs are specific to C. capillaris, supporting the "birth-and-death" hypothesis, or whether they are also present in related species, consistent with the "library hypothesis". Each satDNA family exhibited different evolutionary trajectories. While pCcE9 amplification was specific to C. capillaris, supporting the "birth-and-death" hypothesis, two other analysed satDNAs were present in several related species, consistent with the "library hypothesis". Notably, pCcD29 showed different genomic and chromosomal organisation among C. capillaris and the species from the C. vesicaria group, suggesting that the satDNA evolution model proposed by Ruiz-Ruano et al. for animal systems may also apply to Crepis species. The organisation of the pCcD29 family ranges from numerous small, poorly homogenised loci (C. polymorpha) through organisation in both shorter and longer arrays (C. taraxacifolia) to a few major, highly homogenised loci (C. capillaris), highlighting contrasting evolutionary pathways of satDNAs within closely related species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.