ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2026
Automated analysis of paraspinal muscles: segmentation and multi-parameter quantification in lumbar CT using convolutional neural network.
Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Retrieval-augmented generation-enhanced large language models for comprehensive CAD-RADS 2.0 categorization from structured coronary CTA reports.Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-driven assessment of sarcopenia in orthopedic geriatrics: technical progress and clinical implications.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeManual segmentation in lumbar paraspinal muscle studies is time-consuming, subject to variability, and limits comprehensive evaluation. To solve the problems, we aim to develop a deep learning algorithm for the automatic segmentation and multi-parameter quantification of eight paraspinal muscles in lumbar CT.
methodsWe collected CT images covering the range from the superior endplate of the L1 vertebra to the inferior endplate of the S1 vertebra. The dataset was partitioned into training, validation, and test sets in a ratio of 7:1:2. Six convolutional neural networks were employed to automatically segment the bilateral psoas major, quadratus lumborum, erector spinae, and multifidus across all slices. Model performance was evaluated using the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), Hausdorff Distance (HD), and mean Intersection over Union (mIoU). Muscle parameters including cross-sectional area, muscle volume, fat infiltration, CT density, and paraspinal muscle index were calculated. The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient [ICC(3,1)] was used to assess agreement between model's segmentations and manual ground truth.
results100 lumbar CT scans (age, 55.02 ± 16.2; 62 female) were used for model development. The mean DSC across all six models ranged from 0.754 to 0.903. TransUNet demonstrated the best overall (DSC, 0.903; 95% CI: 0.902, 0.913) (HD, 9.934 mm; 95% CI: 9.815, 11.902) (mIoU, 0.841; 95% CI: 0.839, 0.850). For individual muscles segmented by TransUNet, the highest DSC was 0.936 (95% CI: 0.934-0.938) for the right multifidus. The mean ICC for all parameters was 0.931. The highest ICC value was 0.999 (p < 0.001).
conclusionThe deep learning tool enables automatic and accurate segmentation of eight lumbar paraspinal muscles. Muscle parameter measurements derived from model's segmentations and manual ground truth exhibit high agreement. Accurate segmentation and quantification of paraspinal muscle parameters facilitates large-scale epidemiological studies of paraspinal muscles and spine-related diseases, overcoming the limitations in manual methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41191112What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.