ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2026
Reliability of functional imaging in assessing instability of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis.
Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeSurgical management of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis-whether decompression alone or combined with fusion-often relies on instability assessment with standing flexion-extension radiographs. However, these evaluations are influenced by low back pain and other factors, introducing variability into instability determination and surgical planning. Despite widespread use, the reproducibility of quantitative parameters remains unclear. This study evaluated the reproducibility of commonly used quantitative indicators from lumbar functional imaging.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 112 patients with L4-5 degenerative spondylolisthesis who underwent two sets of standing flexion-extension radiographs within six months. Five parameters were measured: Changes in lumbar lordosis during flexion [ΔLL(flex)], changes during extension [ΔLL(ext)], sagittal translation (ST), posterior opening (PO), and segmental angulation (SA). Instability was defined as ST ≥ 3 mm or ≥ 8% of the upper vertebral body width, PO ≥ 5°, or SA ≥ 20°, and diagnostic consistency was examined. Two raters independently assessed all radiographs. Test-retest, intra-rater, and inter-rater reliabilities were determined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC [1, 1] ICC [1, 2]). Bland-Altman analysis tested fixed and proportional bias.
resultsDiagnostic discrepancies between imaging sessions occurred in 25.0-27.7%. ΔLL(flex) showed poor test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.23, 0.32), whereas ΔLL(ext) and PO demonstrated higher reliability. ST and SA yielded low ICC values. Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability was consistently good (ICC > 0.75), and no fixed or proportional bias was detected.
conclusionVariability in flexion influenced ST and SA, potentially affecting instability diagnosis. Standardized imaging protocols and clearer patient instructions are essential to improve diagnostic accuracy and reliability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41191108What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.