Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41191102›Full record

ArticleActa neurochirurgica2025

Under forty hours of laboratory training may be sufficient for teaching basic microsurgical skills to novices.

Adam Yousfi, Ville Vasankari, Anni Pohjola, Anna Maria Auricchio, Francesco Calvanese, Ahmad Hafez, Martin Lehecka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Adam YousfiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. adam.yousfi@helsinki.fi.
Ville Vasankari *Department of Neurosurgery, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Anni Pohjola *Department of Neurosurgery, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Anna Maria AuricchioDepartment of Neurosurgery, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Francesco CalvaneseDepartment of Neurosurgery, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Ahmad HafezDepartment of Neurosurgery, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Martin LeheckaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStructured laboratory-based microsurgical training is considered beneficial for junior residents before they begin to work in a neurosurgical operating room. The optimal duration of such training remains unclear. We studied the effect of a 40-h microsurgical laboratory course on the development of basic microsurgical skills among novices.

methodsA total of 27 medical students participated in the study. Seven students (5 men, 2 women) underwent a structured microsurgical laboratory training program over four weeks. 20 students (10 women, 10 men) served as an untrained control group. None of the students had prior experience in microsuturing or working under magnification. The intervention group practiced for two hours per day, five days per week, over a four-week period. Skill development was assessed at baseline, after two weeks, and after four weeks of training with a microsuturing test task, and was monitored continuously throughout the training period with a microscraping test task. Microsurgical performance was compared between the intervention and the control groups using a test task performed under a surgical exoscope after two weeks of training. This task assessed complex depth perception and hand-eye coordination through the precise placement of a microneedle into small, concealed targets.

resultsFor the microsuturing task the median time improved throughout the training (baseline: 44 min (interquartile range IQR = 22), 20 h training: 21 min (IQR = 6), 40 h training: 14 min (IQR = 4)). Similarly, the duration of the scraping task improved (baseline: 40 min (IQR 2), 20 h training: 15 min (IQR = 7), 40 h training: 13 min (IQR = 7)). The quality of work, including scraping accuracy, suture tightness and spacing, remained consistent in both tasks. In the exoscope task, the intervention group outperformed the control group (median task duration 6 min 54 s, IQR = 3 min vs 9 min 24 s, IQR = 6 min; p = 0.04).

conclusionsNovices demonstrated rapid improvement during a 40-h microsurgical laboratory training course. Even less than 40 h of structured practice might be enough for surgical novices, such as neurosurgery residents, to learn the most basic microsurgical skills prior to assisting in the operating room.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceMicrosurgeryNeurosurgeryNeurosurgical ProceduresAdultFemaleHumansMaleStudents, MedicalTime FactorsExoscopeMicrosurgeryNeurosurgeryNovicesResidencyResidentsSurgical training

Identifiers

PMID41191102
PMCPMC12589380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.