ArticlePlanta2025
Integrated analysis of multifactorial stress combination impact on citrus plants.
Article in Planta, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Harnessing synergistic potential of plant growth promoting bacteria to mitigate climate-induced stress in plants.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Climate change and citrus nutrition: mechanisms, nutrient imbalances, and inclusive management.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
MAIN
conclusionMultifactorial stress combination negatively affects citrus performance, especially when these plants are under three or more stresses, affecting citrus growth at different levels including phenotypic, physiological, biochemical and molecular levels. In nature, biotic and abiotic factors affect plant growth and development. "Multifactorial Stress Combination" (MFSC) refers to situations in which three or more stressors occur simultaneously or sequentially on plants. Its importance lies in the drastic reduction in plant survival under such complex stress scenarios. In this work, we studied the effect of five stresses and their combinations (deficiencies in nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium with water and heat stress) on Carrizo citrange, a citrus genotype widely used in physiological studies. Nutrient deficiencies were applied for three months using specific irrigation solutions. To impose heat stress, plants were maintained for three days in environmental chambers set at 24 °C (control) and 40 °C (heat), while drought was simulated by transferring them to dry perlite. MFSC clearly impacted plant phenotype, increasing leaf damage and decreasing shoot weight, particularly under three or more stressors. Gas exchange parameters and total pigment content were only affected under the combination of four or five stressors, respectively. Oxidative damage increased in plants subjected to five stresses, as indicated by increased malonaldehyde content. A progressive rise was observed in abscisic acid, jasmonic acid, salicylic acid, phaseic acid and indole-3-acetic acid as stress complexity increased, highlighting their involvement as key regulators of the plant stress response. The observed upregulation of galactose metabolism suggested an alternative pathway for energy production and sugar accumulation as essential responses to a complex stress scenario. Overall, results demonstrate the severe impact of MFSC on citrus development, with plant damage increasing exponentially under three or more stressors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.