Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41191060›Full record

ReviewRadiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2025

[Pneumonia in childhood and adolescence].

Friederike Koerber

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Friederike KoerberInstitut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Schwerpunkt Kinder- und Jugendradiologie, Universität zu Köln, Medizinische Fakultät und Uniklinik, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland. friederike.koerber@uk-koeln.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPneumonia plays a significant clinical and epidemiological role in childhood and adolescence. The most common form is community-acquired pneumonia ("pCAP"). However, pneumonia that arises due to immunodeficiency-such as that caused by chemotherapy or pre-existing, mostly congenital, underlying diseases-must be distinguished. RESEARCH QUESTION: The aim of this work is to present the value of various radiological methods for diagnosing pneumonia in children and adolescents. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe advantages and disadvantages of radiological methods (X-ray, ultrasound, computed tomography [CT], and magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]) for diagnostic use in the three classic forms of pneumonia and their typical complications are presented. Age-specific characteristics in childhood and adolescence and their implications for imaging are discussed, with particular attention to pneumonia under immunosuppression. RESULTS AND

conclusionMost patients with pneumonia in childhood and adolescence, especially those with pCAP, do not initially require radiological imaging. Imaging becomes necessary in patients who lack clinical improvement or complications are suspected. Chest X‑ray remains the first-line method due to its ease of use, widespread availability, and relatively low radiation dose, and is complemented by ultrasound. CT is indicated in cases of severe complications of pCAP. In pneumonia associated with immunosuppression, CT is often the first-line method, as it is significantly more sensitive than X‑ray and permits better characterization of the type of pneumonia and possible complications.

Indexed as

Diagnostic ImagingPneumoniaAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolCommunity-Acquired InfectionsFemaleHumansInfantMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleTomography, X-Ray ComputedUltrasonographyClassical radiological manifestationImaging diagnosticLow-dose computed tomographyPaediatric radiologySpecifics in childhood and adolescence

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.