ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2026
Pre-resection ligament balance more frequently reproduces joint line orientation compared to inverse-kinematic workflow in robotic total knee arthroplasty.
Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Predictive pre-resection robotic ligament balancing in total knee arthroplasty is accurate across surgeons and patient factors.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeRobotic total knee arthroplasty (TKA) enables the acquisition of ligament balance data at various stages in the surgical workflow to inform implant planning. This study aims to compare pre-resection joint balancing versus inverse-kinematic workflows on implant positioning, joint line obliquity and coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) phenotype.
methodsA single-surgeon single-institution series of 422 primary posterior-cruciate sacrificing TKAs using a digital ligament tensioner was reviewed. The first 213 cases assessed gaps after tibial and before femoral resections (tibia-first group) in an inverse-kinematic alignment (iKA) workflow. The subsequent 174 cases assessed gaps before any bone resections (pre-resection group) in a femur-first kinematic alignment (KA) workflow. Native and postoperative medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) and lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA) were compared using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, and CPAK phenotype distributions were compared using chi-square tests.
resultsMean preoperative MPTA and LDFA were within 0.5° between groups. Postoperative measurements differed between tibia-first and pre-resection for both MPTA (88.3° ± 1.5° vs. 86.7° ± 1.7°, p < 0.001) and LDFA (90.7° ± 2.1° vs. 89.4° ± 2.4°, p < 0.001). The tibia-first group had greater preoperative to postoperative change in MPTA (0.7° ± 1.3° vs. -0.5° ± 1.7°, p < 0.001), LDFA (2.5° ± 1.7° vs. 1.4° ± 1.5°, p < 0.001) and joint line obliquity (3.2° ± 2.5° vs. 0.9° ± 2.6°, p < 0.001). The pre-resection group had more patients whose CPAK phenotype did not change postoperatively (35% vs. 25%, p < 0.05), and fewer patients with CPAK changes > 1 (9% vs. 29%, p < 0.001). Final mediolateral balance was within 1 mm of neutral for both groups throughout flexion.
conclusionsWhile both techniques achieved a similar balance, a pre-resection ligament balancing workflow better restored native joint line obliquity and CPAK phenotype compared to an iKA workflow. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.