ArticleMicrosurgery2025
Salvage Reconstruction With Recycled Flap Pedicles in Head-and-Neck Surgery: A Report of Two Cases.
Article in Microsurgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Salvage Reconstruction With Recycled Flap Pedicles in Head-and-Neck Surgery: A Report of Two Cases.Microsurgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Free-flap reconstruction of head-and-neck defects is often complicated by a vessel-depleted neck after prior surgery or radiotherapy. Conventional alternatives-such as using contralateral vessels, distant recipient vessels, or interpositional vein grafts-are technically demanding and associated with additional risks. We present two salvage reconstructions in which the vascular pedicle of a previously transferred free flap was reused as recipient vessels when standard options were unavailable. A 79-year-old man developed exposure of a titanium mandibular plate 6 years after mandibular resection reconstructed with a free anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap. Preoperative ultrasonography and contrast-enhanced computed tomography confirmed patency of the ALT flap pedicle despite dense fibrosis. After removal of the exposed plate, the pedicle was carefully dissected, and a scapular osteocutaneous flap (9 × 12 cm skin, 2.5 × 11 cm bone) was anastomosed to the lateral circumflex femoral artery and vein of the existing pedicle. Both flaps survived, and postoperative cholecystitis was managed conservatively. In another case, a 63-year-old man with a history of reconstruction using a free ALT flap for recurrent temporal meningioma developed another recurrence 2 years later. Imaging confirmed patency of the previous pedicle. During salvage surgery, the pedicle was dissected, and a free rectus-abdominis flap (9 × 20 cm) was harvested. Arterial anastomosis was performed to the artery of the previous ALT pedicle, and venous drainage was established directly into the internal jugular vein due to insufficient pedicle vein caliber. Intraoperative indocyanine green fluorescence angiography confirmed flap perfusion, and both flaps healed uneventfully. These cases show that reusing the vascular pedicle of a prior free flap may provide a practical salvage option in vessel-depleted necks. Careful preoperative imaging, intraoperative assessment of flap viability, and meticulous microsurgical technique are essential for success. This approach suggests that pedicle reuse may simplify salvage reconstruction while preserving previously transferred flaps when conventional recipient vessels are unavailable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.