ArticleMicrosurgery2025
Donor Site Morbidity in Fibula Free Flaps: A Technique-Dependent Comparative Analysis of Donor Site Wound Healing.
Article in Microsurgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe fibula free flap (FFF) is a mainstay in maxillofacial reconstruction, yet donor site morbidity remains a significant clinical concern. Closure technique is a key factor influencing complication rates, but comparative data remain heterogeneous. This study provides a technique-dependent analysis of 60-day donor site wound healing in FFF with skin paddles and reports a two-stage closure approach.
methodsA retrospective review of 211 patients undergoing FFF between 2017 and 2024 was conducted. Donor site complications within the first 60 postoperative days were assessed and stratified by closure technique: one-stage split-thickness skin grafting (STSG) with or without negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT), and a two-stage closure consisting of one-week NPWT followed by STSG. Multivariate logistic regression was applied to identify independent predictors for complications.
resultsOverall, 50.2% of patients experienced donor site complications, with wound healing disorders (31.8%) and (partial) skin necrosis (23.7%) most prevalent. Regarding wound closure, STSG coverage without NPWT was associated with the highest morbidity and a complication rate of 91.0%. Despite being limited in sample size, the two-stage closure, despite larger skin defects, showed complication rates comparable to one-stage closure with NPWT. Multivariate analysis identified STSG with NPWT (OR 0.1 [0.01; 0.4], p = 0.002) and two-stage closure (OR 0.1 [0.01; 0.5], p = 0.01) as protective factors for wound healing complications.
conclusionDonor site morbidity following FFF harvest with skin paddles is significantly impacted by closure technique. Wound management using one- or two-stage STSG with NPWT is preferred. Initial results of the two-stage closure indicate potentially beneficial outcomes for extensive defects and warrant further prospective validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.