ArticleEuropean journal of public health2025
Opportunities and challenges of a population health management approach for improving young people's mental health.
Article in European journal of public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Gaps and opportunities in mental health support for young people: a process evaluation of a multi component intervention.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Population Health Management uses available data to tailor services to identified and latent needs. It is advocated by the integrated care system in England, yet challenges remain regarding data availability, linkage, and application. This paper reports on the adoption of a population health management approach to design a complex programme aimed at improving young people's mental health. In-depth qualitative interviews were conducted with local government public health professionals (PH) (n = 5), intervention leads (n = 3), and one focus group of young contributors to intervention design (n = 5) to explore how population health management informed programme design and was perceived by stakeholders. Data were analysed using Delve.io. Key learning for public health included: (i) Data analysis for the PHM approach was strengthened by a dedicated data scientist, though some regarded the PHM approach as not new; (ii) Routine data had limited capacity to fully identify need, and linking datasets across health, social care, and education remained difficult; (iii) Local insights and co-production with young people were critical in identifying target groups not visible in routine datasets. Routine health data capture only part of the picture, often reflecting those already in contact with services. PHM approaches in public health need to integrate qualitative insights and local intelligence alongside quantitative analysis to address inequalities effectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.