ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025
Semiparametric confidence sets for cross-sectional and longitudinal neuroimaging.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The majority of neuroimaging inference focuses on hypothesis testing rather than effect estimation. With concerns about replicability, there is growing interest in reporting standardized effect sizes from neuroimaging group-level analyses. Confidence sets for effect sizes were recently developed for neuroimaging, but are restricted to simple univariate contrasts (e.g., one-sample or two-sample test Cohen's d) and cross-sectional data. Thus, existing methods exclude increasingly common longitudinal associations of biological brain measurements with, potentially nonlinear, inter- and intra-individual variations in diagnosis, development, or symptoms. We use modern methods for confidence sets combined with a recently proposed robust effect size index to provide a very general approach and software for effect size confidence set inference in neuroimaging. Our method involves robust estimation of the effect size image and spatial and temporal covariance function based on generalized estimating equations. We use a nonparametric bootstrap to estimate the joint distribution of the robust effect size image across voxels to construct confidence sets. These confidence sets identify regions of the image where the lower or upper simultaneous confidence interval is above or below a given threshold with high probability. We evaluate the coverage and simultaneous confidence interval width of the proposed procedures using realistic simulations and perform longitudinal analyses of aging and diagnostic differences of cortical thickness in Alzheimer's disease and diagnostic differences of resting-state hippocampal activity in psychosis. This comprehensive approach, along with the visualization functions integrated into the pbj R package, offers a robust tool for analyzing repeated neuroimaging measurements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.