Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41190330›Full record

ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025

Denoising strategies of functional connectivity MRI data in lesional and non-lesional brain diseases.

Stephan Wunderlich, Cagatay Alici, Saeed Motevalli, Veit Stoecklein, Louisa von Baumgarten, Florian Schöberl, Marion Subklewe, Enrico Schulz, Sophia Stoecklein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Stephan WunderlichDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Cagatay AliciDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Saeed MotevalliDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Veit StoeckleinDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Louisa von BaumgartenDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Florian SchöberlDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Marion SubkleweDepartment of Medicine III, University Hospital Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Enrico SchulzDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Sophia StoeckleinDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional connectivity magnetic resonance imaging (fcMRI) is a widely utilized tool for analyzing functional connectivity (FC) in both healthy and diseased brains. However, patients with brain disorders are particularly susceptible to head movement during scanning, which can introduce substantial noise and compromise data quality. Therefore, identifying optimal denoising strategies is essential to ensure reliable and accurate downstream data analysis for both lesional and non-lesional brain conditions. In this study, we analyzed data from four cohorts: healthy subjects, patients with brain lesions (glioma, meningioma), and patients with a non-lesional encephalopathic condition. Our goal was to evaluate various denoising strategies using quality control (QC) metrics to identify the most effective approach for minimizing noise while preserving the integrity of the blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) signal, tailored to each disease type. The effectiveness of denoising strategies varied based on the data quality and whether the data were derived from lesional or non-lesional diseases. At comparable levels of head motion, combinations involving independent component analysis-based automatic removal of motion artifacts (ICA-AROMA) denoising strategies were most effective for data from a non-lesional encephalopathic condition, while combinations including anatomical component correction (CC) yielded the best results for data from lesional conditions. Here, we present the first comparison of denoising pipelines for patients with lesional and non-lesional brain diseases. A key finding was that, at comparable levels of head motion, the optimal denoising strategy varies depending on the nature of the brain disease.

Indexed as

denoising methodsfcMRIhead motionlesionalnon-lesionalresting state

Identifiers

PMID41190330
PMCPMC12580809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.