Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41190318›Full record

ArticleJournal of hunger & environmental nutrition2025

Use of a systematic process to improve the utility of a home food environment audit tool.

Leslie A Lytle, Sarah Friend, Mary O Hearst, Melissa N Laska, Jayne A Fulkerson

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of hunger & environmental nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Leslie A LytleSchool of Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Sarah FriendSchool of Nursing, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Mary O HearstSchool of Nursing, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Melissa N LaskaSchool of Public Health, Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Jayne A FulkersonUniversity of Minnesota, University of Minnesota School of Nursing, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

Funding

Innovation in Measurement for Diet-Related Disease Research: Optimizing Utility and Reach to Reduce Health DisparitiesR01CA248200 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Jayne Allyn Fulkerson · 2021 to 2026
$2.9M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA248200
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper describes a process to reduce the length of a validated home food audit tool without compromising its strong psychometric properties. A team of investigators used secondary data to make consensus decisions about item reduction of the audit tool. The steps included assessing content validity of individual food items within food categories and construct validity of food items and related nutrient intake. The process resulted in a 25% reduction in the number of items included in the tool without compromising its psychometric properties. This work serves as a guide for other researchers wanting to reduce measurement-related participant burden.

Indexed as

data reductionfood environmental audit toolsHome food auditpsychometric properties

Identifiers

PMID41190318
PMCPMC12582375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.