ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025
Main elements of current spine biomechanics research: model, installation and test data.
Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biomechanical principles are crucial for spinal research, enabling precise analysis of spinal behavior under various conditions. Through quantitative analysis and simulation of mechanical information, spinal function can be optimized, posture improved, and injury risk reduced. However, current methodologies in spine biomechanics remain incomplete and challenging for researchers to apply effectively. This paper reviews recent advances in experimental models, loading methods, instrumentation, and test data used in spine biomechanics research, aiming to provide a reference for research design and future developments in the field. Two primary types of research objects are highlighted: measurement models and digital models. Common loading modes include dynamic, quasi-static, and static approaches. Various experimental setups, each with distinct characteristics, play essential roles in simulating motion and collecting data. The most frequently used biomechanical indicators are also discussed. In summary, this work redefines, categorizes, and synthesizes the typical research workflow in spinal biomechanics. It is foreseeable that more unified, accurate, and innovative studies will enhance the application of spinal biomechanics in rehabilitation, treatment, auxiliary materials, and clinical evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.