ArticleClinical medicine insights. Endocrinology and diabetes2025
Relationship Between Glycemic Indices and eGFR Values Among Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Individuals With Chronic Kidney Disease Across Various Progression Stages.
Article in Clinical medicine insights. Endocrinology and diabetes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interpretation of Glycemic Biomarkers Across Stages of Chronic Kidney Disease.Clinical medicine insights. Endocrinology and diabetes · 2026Article
- Comment on "Relationship Between Glycemic Indices and eGFR Values Among Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Individuals With Chronic Kidney Disease Across Various Progression Stages".Clinical medicine insights. Endocrinology and diabetes · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: T2DM is a significant contributor to hypoglycemia, mortality, CVD, as well as a leading cause of CKD. Understanding and managing glycosylation discrepancies in T2DM patients with CKD is critical because they are important in disease causation and progression. Aim of this correlation study was to investigate the accuracy of HbA1c and fructosamine as predictors of declining renal function in the context of T2DM, by comparing and evaluating their relationships with eGFR across stages 1 to 5. Methods: We included individuals with T2DM aged over 18 years, diagnosed per ADA guidelines, and potential CKD (stage 1-5) in T2DM patients. Outcomes involved measuring HbA1c and fructosamine levels of all participants. Results: We recruited 424 participants from Department of Medicine, Kasturba Medical College, MAHE, Manipal on OPD & IPD. For patient in CKD stage 1 to 4, a weak positive correlation was noticed between HbA1c and eGFR. For patient in CKD stage 1 to 4, a weak negative correlation was found between eGFR and Fructosamine. Conclusion: For determining long-term blood sugar management and forecasting the course of kidney disease in individuals with type 2 diabetes, the HbA1c test remains a crucial and dependable tool. However, it might occasionally be more difficult to interpret HbA1c values in later stages of CKD. Fructosamine, a shorter-term blood sugar indicator, can offer useful further information in certain situations. We advise combining the 2 tests for optimal diabetes management: fructosamine for prompt medication modifications, particularly in advanced CKD and HbA1c for long term trends and risk assessments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.