ReviewChemical science2025
Modeling the potential energy surface by force fields for heterogeneous catalysis: classification, applications, and challenges.
Review in Chemical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Restructuring-Regulated Bismuth Catalyst Promotes Electrochemical COSmall science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The concept of the potential energy surface (PES) in computational simulations is essential for studying material properties and heterogeneous catalytic processes. However, constructing the PES using quantum mechanical methods is computationally expensive and typically limited to small systems. Force field methods, which rely on quantum mechanical data, use simple functional relationships to establish a mapping between system energy and atomic positions or charges. Force field methods are more efficient for handling large-scale systems, such as catalyst structures, adsorption and diffusion of reaction molecules, and heterogeneous catalytic processes. To further promote in-depth research in this field, this review introduces the classification, development, and characteristics of various force field methods including classical force fields, reactive force fields, and machine learning force fields. It summarizes the forms, fitting methods, and distinct periods of these force field methods. Additionally, these force field approaches are compared in terms of their applicability, accuracy, efficiency, and fitting methods. Finally, the optimization and challenges of force field methods in constructing the PES are discussed. It is expected that this review will assist researchers in selecting and applying different force field methods more effectively to promote in-depth understanding of catalytic reaction mechanisms and the efficient design of catalysts.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.