ArticleChemical science2025
Solvation strategies for free-energy calculations in a halogen-bonded complex: implicit, explicit, and machine learning approaches.
Article in Chemical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Future of Foundation Machine Learning Potentials and DFT in Homogeneous Catalysis: Competition or Synergy?Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In pursuit of an efficient solvation approach for the halogen bonded complex between molecular iodine and tetramethylthiourea that reliably reproduces experimental trends, we investigated a range of solvent models, from implicit representations to periodic metadynamics simulations alongside micro-solvation and ONIOM-based methods as robust alternatives. Implicit solvent models fail to describe halogen-bonded complexes in high-polar solvents but provide surprisingly accurate estimates of binding free energies in all low to moderately polar solvents. For accurate and reliable modeling, especially in polar media, explicit solvent representations are essential. Periodic metadynamics simulations typically provide enhanced accuracy in calculating free energy differences, particularly for systems with complex solvation behavior. However, they are computationally demanding and restricted to generalized gradient approximation functionals (GGA). To overcome this limitation and improve accuracy, we employed the machine learning perturbation theory technique, enabling the estimation of free energies at levels of theory beyond the GGA.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.