Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41190133›Full record

ArticleRegenerative biomaterials2025

Aligned nanofibers in biomimetic periosteal extracellular matrix/poly(ε-caprolactone) membranes enhance bone regeneration via the ITGB1/PI3K/AKT pathway.

Zhuohao Wen, Shuyi Li, Huiguo Qiu, Xueyan Liu, Zhiying You, Yuhan Yan, Yuejuan Che, Miao Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Regenerative biomaterials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Development-based In Vivo Bioreactor Strategy for Challenging Senescent Bone Reconstruction.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. How Emerging Nanomaterials are Effective in Bone Regeneration?International journal of nanomedicine · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Zhuohao WenDepartment of Stomatology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Shuyi LiDepartment of Stomatology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Huiguo QiuZhuhai Stomatological Hospital, Zhuhai 519000, China.
Xueyan LiuAffiliated Stomatology Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangdong Engineering Research Center of Oral Restoration and Reconstruction, Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Basic and Applied Research of Oral Regenerative Medicine, Guangzhou 510182, China.
Zhiying YouDepartment of Stomatology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Yuhan YanDepartment of Stomatology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Yuejuan CheDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Materials Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China.
Miao ZhouDepartment of Stomatology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510080, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0788-1923

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Periosteum plays an indispensable role in bone regeneration by providing osteogenic and angiogenic cues essential for tissue repair. In cases of severe bone defects or nonunion, autologous vascularized periosteum transplantation remains a highly effective clinical solution. However, its application is restricted by donor site morbidity and limited tissue availability, thereby underscoring the urgent need for artificial periosteum that mimics both the composition and structure of the native counterpart. Among these properties, the topological morphology of the periosteum is believed to be critical, yet its influence on bone regeneration remains insufficiently understood. In this study, biomimetic periosteum membranes composed of coaxially electrospun poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) and periosteal extracellular matrix (pECM) were fabricated with either random or aligned nanofiber architectures. Their osteogenic potential was systematically evaluated

Indexed as

biomimetic periosteumbone regenerationintegrin β1periosteal extracellular matrixtopological morphology

Identifiers

PMID41190133
PMCPMC12582390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.