Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41190113›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Exploring the impact of psychological capital and work-family conflict on stress regulation and success in competitive athletes.

Bing Bai, Rui Ma, Jabbar Rehima

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bing BaiPhysical Education Department, Jiangxi University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Rui MaPhysical Education School of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Jabbar RehimaDepartment of Sport Education, College of Education, The Islamic University, Najaf, Iraq.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The psychological well-being of athletes is influenced by multiple interconnected factors that can significantly impact their performance outcomes. This study examined the predictive relationships between psychological capital, work-family conflict, and perceived stress in determining athletic success. We investigated how these psychological constructs influence performance outcomes among professional athletes. The combined sample comprised 240 professional athletes who completed validated measures of psychological capital, work-family conflict, and perceived stress. Discriminant analysis was employed to identify which variables most effectively differentiated between successful and less successful athletes. Results revealed that psychological capital dimensions and work-family conflict significantly predicted athletic performance outcomes. Stepwise discriminant analysis identified optimism, self-efficacy, hope, work-family conflict, and resilience as the strongest predictors of athletic success. The findings demonstrate that work-family conflict serves as a critical mediating factor between psychological capital and athletic performance, with increased conflict associated with elevated stress levels and diminished psychological resources. These results highlight the importance of considering athletes' broader life context when examining performance predictors. The study contributes to understanding how personal psychological resources interact with external stressors in the athletic domain, suggesting that interventions addressing both individual psychological capital and work-family balance may be most effective in supporting athletic achievement.

Indexed as

athletic successperceived stresspsychological capitalsports successwork–family conflict

Identifiers

PMID41190113
PMCPMC12581204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.