ArticleBMJ public health2025
Culture, context and crisis: understanding community engagement in Ghana's Ashanti and Northern regions amid COVID-19 - a qualitative study.
Article in BMJ public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the critical role of community engagement in public health responses. While national-level interventions in Ghana have been documented, limited research exists on how regional differences shape engagement strategies. This study compares the Ashanti and Northern regions, two areas with contrasting socioeconomic, cultural and epidemiological contexts, to examine how community engagement was implemented during the COVID-19 response. Methods: A qualitative study was conducted in the two regions from November 2023 to February 2024. We conducted interviews with 24 key informants and facilitated two focus group discussions with 20 participants. Data collection involved community mapping, key informant interviews and focus group discussions with community leaders, health officials and vulnerable groups in the selected communities. Data were coded and analysed using MAXQDA analysis software employing thematic analysis, guided by frameworks from Gilmore and Popay. Results: In the Ashanti region, engagement strategies were more centralised and formal, using mass media and structured messaging from health professionals. Conversely, the Northern region implemented decentralised, community-led approaches through traditional leaders, interpersonal communication and community-based surveillance volunteers. Logistics provision also differed; Ashanti benefited from structured supply chains, while the Northern region relied on community-led innovations due to resource limitations. Centralised approaches in Ashanti enabled coordinated messaging, whereas Northern strategies were perceived to foster deeper trust and participation. Conclusion: Community engagement strategies varied across regions, reflecting underlying governance structures and socio-cultural dynamics. Decentralised approaches were associated with higher levels of community participation and trust, while centralised models supported efficient coordination. While this study does not assess the impact of engagement strategies on health outcomes, it highlights the need for contextually adapted strategies that balance structured public health directives with meaningful community involvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.