Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41189980›Full record

ArticleEuropean clinical respiratory journal2025

Autonomy preferences and behaviors towards asthma medication in online asthma education: a secondary analysis of a cluster randomized controlled trial in adults with asthma.

Stefanie Eck, Andrea Baumgärtel, Alexander Hapfelmeier, Klaus Linde, Linda Sanftenberg, Stefanie Stark, Antonius Schneider, Bavarian Practice-Based Research Network (BayFoNet)

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European clinical respiratory journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Stefanie EckInstitute of General Practice and Health Services Research, Department Clinical Medicine, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4708-9001
Andrea BaumgärtelInstitute of General Practice and Health Services Research, Department Clinical Medicine, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.
Alexander HapfelmeierInstitute of General Practice and Health Services Research, Department Clinical Medicine, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.
Klaus LindeInstitute of General Practice and Health Services Research, Department Clinical Medicine, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.
Linda SanftenbergInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany.
Stefanie StarkInstitute of General Practice, Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Antonius SchneiderInstitute of General Practice and Health Services Research, Department Clinical Medicine, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.
Bavarian Practice-Based Research Network (BayFoNet)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Education programs are essential to involve individuals with asthma in disease management and improve outcomes. We aimed to investigate the effects of a pilot-tested online asthma education program (eAEP) on autonomy preferences and medication behavior in adults with asthma in general practices. Methods: We performed a pre-planned secondary analysis of a cluster randomized trial comparing the eAEP with usual care (UC) in terms of Asthma Knowledge Test (AKT) scores. The Autonomy Preference Index (API) was used to assess patients' preferences for information (information preference) and involvement in medical decisions (participation preference). Participants evaluated eight statements regarding medication behavior. Outcomes were analyzed at baseline and six months. Results: A total of 108 asthma patients (mean age: 47 years, 59% female) were analyzed. Increases in AKT scores were substantially larger in intervention groups (7.9 (95% CI 4.9-10.8), Conclusions: The eAEP did not result in larger increases in autonomy preferences compared to UC, but indicated beneficial effects on some forms of medication behavior. Larger studies are required for further insights.

Indexed as

adherenceAsthmaautonomydecision-makingdigital interventioneducationprimary care

Identifiers

PMID41189980
PMCPMC12581774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.