ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Different therapeutic responses to osimertinib as first-line treatment for cavitated and non-cavitated squamous cell lung cancer with rare EGFR exon 19 deletion: two case reports and a literature review.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cavitation is a special radiological feature of lung cancer, commonly observed in squamous cell lung cancer (SqCLC). This study intended to report two cases of cavitated and non-cavitated SqCLCs treated with epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) and discuss their different therapeutic responses. Case presentation: Two SqCLC patients with EGFR exon 19 deletions were treated with osimertinib as first-line therapy. One patient presented with a thick-walled cavitated lesion, while the other had a non-cavitated mass. After 3 months of osimertinib treatment, the cavitated SqCLC case showed disease progression. This patient subsequently underwent surgical resection of the primary tumor, followed by chemotherapy and immunotherapy, achieving an overall survival of 41 months to date. In contrast, the non-cavitated SqCLC case responded better to osimertinib, achieving partial remission with a progression-free survival of 14 months. Upon subsequent growth in both the primary lesion and lymph nodes, this patient began treatment with chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy, with a current overall survival of 31 months. Conclusions: These cases suggest that osimertinib may be less effective as a first-line treatment for EGFR driver gene positive cavitated SqCLC than non-cavitated cases. Further research is needed to evaluate whether combining EGFR-TKIs with other therapies provides greater benefits than EGFR-TKIs alone for EGFR-positive cavitated SqCLC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.