ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Reconstruction strategies for extensive bone defects following resection of primary malignant tumors in the distal radius.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to evaluate surgical resection techniques for primary malignant tumors of the distal radius and to examine the reconstruction strategies employed for resulting large bone defects. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 11 cases involving the resection and reconstruction of primary malignant tumors in the distal radius. Complete medical records and follow-up data from December 2013 to December 2022 were reviewed. Oncological outcomes were assessed, with specific focus on the extent of tumor invasion, surgical resection techniques, and reconstruction strategies. Results: The follow-up period ranged from 5 to 118 months, with a mean duration of 41.6 months. At the final follow-up, local recurrence was observed in three patients, six died due to disease progression, and five were alive. For tumors confined to the distal radius, resection of the distal radius follow by joint-preserving reconstruction using either autologous fibular grafts or 3D-printed prostheses. For tumors involving the distal radius, proximal carpal bones, and/or distal ulna, wrist arthrodesis are chose using either autologous fibular grafts or ipsilateral ulnar transposition with arthrodesis For tumors involving more than half of the distal radius, reconstruction strategies include ulnar-only fixation or wrist arthrodesis with ipsilateral ulnar transposition. Conclusions: Primary malignant tumors of the distal radius are rare and associated with a poor prognosis. Selection of resection and reconstruction techniques is primarily influenced by the extent of tumor invasion, with joint-preserving strategies feasible in selected cases and arthrodesis required for more extensive bone involvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.