Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41189927›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental epigenetics2025

A cost-effective method for combining the power of genetic and epigenetic selection in animal production.

Núria Sánchez-Baizán, Marine Herlin, Adrián Millán, Paulino Martínez, María Dolores López Belluga, Francesc Piferrer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental epigenetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Núria Sánchez-BaizánInstitut de Ciències del Mar (ICM), Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), Barcelona 08003, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3722-5188
Marine HerlinAqüicultura Balear, S.A.U., Coll D'en Rabassa, Balearic Islands 07007, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8563-7120
Adrián MillánGeneaqua SL, Lugo 27002, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2914-3067
Paulino MartínezDepartment of Zoology, Genetics and Physical Anthropology, Facultad de Veterinaria, Campus Terra, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Lugo 15705, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8438-9305
María Dolores López BellugaCulmarex, S.A.U., Águilas, Murcia 30899, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2651-4100
Francesc PiferrerInstitut de Ciències del Mar (ICM), Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), Barcelona 08003, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0903-4736

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional breeding programs have largely focused on genetics, often overlooking environmental and epigenetic influences on phenotypic variability. Current methods for developing epigenetic biomarkers (EBs) with machine learning (ML) algorithms require extensive data, making them costly and time-intensive. In this study, using a fish as a model, we analysed ~500 000 CpG loci in samples from 60 different families to develop EBs for broodstock selection. To address limited sample sizes at the sequencing stage, we combined careful sample selection, statistical filtering, and various feature selection and ML algorithms. As a result, we identified three heritable CpGs sites in sire sperm associated with three key performance indicators in their offspring: biomass, fast-growing females, and resistance to the masculinizing effects of high temperature. Then, we were able to build a model successfully predicting the best sire broodstock based on DNA methylation levels of these EBs. This model was validated across three independent trials, including one involving an external cohort of fish with differentiated genetic background, thereby confirming its robustness beyond the training population. Yield was increased up to 1.4-fold when including epigenetic selection into the genetic selection program as compared with genetic selection alone. In summary, we present a cost-effective strategy for integrating epigenetic and genetic selection in the context of animal production. Furthermore, this method also can be applied to assess the impact of environmental factors into the broodstock and on samples where obtaining information can be challenging, such as in the study of the epigenetic basis of rare diseases, and the application of epigenetic markers in conservation biology.

Indexed as

breeding programsepigenetic biomarkersfeature selectionkey performance indicatorsmachine learningpolygenic traits

Identifiers

PMID41189927
PMCPMC12581941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.